Editor’s Note: This is the seventh post in the “Seeds 2: New Research in Environmental History” series co-sponsored by NiCHE and Edge Effects, publicising the work of early-career environmental historians. This series serves to highlight new work being done in the field of environmental history and connect this research to other fields and contemporary issues.
By Naomi Calnitsky
In the nineteenth century, Kānaka Maoli, or Indigenous Hawaiians, were intricately entangled within the lumber and salmon industries at key sites across the Pacific Northwest. They would prove integral to the environmental histories of the region as participants in trans-Pacific networks of commerce and a broader Pacific world of labor that included a maritime fur trade and later a land-based fur trade. Hawaiians in the Columbia District—and, later, in the British Columbia colony—worked in concert with British commercial colonialism in the Pacific Northwest through their involvement in the region’s early extractive and productive industries: timber, fishing and small-scale agriculture.
The trade that would develop between the Pacific Northwest and the Hawaiian islands from 1829 to 1859 saw native Hawaiians employed on forts and throughout the Pacific Northwest for the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC). In effect, a circular trade that brought lumber cut and salmon caught and cured in the Pacific Northwest to Hawaii also saw the islands provide products for consumers on the coast. The HBC employed indigenous Hawaiian laborers as part of its growing presence throughout the Pacific Northwest in the nineteenth century. The existing historical literature on Hawaiian overseas migration often details stories of male servants and migrants, many of whom would ultimately become a part of late-nineteenth-century settler society in early colonies like British Columbia. Still, there was no “straightforward shift” to settler colonialism; if anything, the story of Hawaiians within this longer narrative sat for a long time along the colony’s “ragged” margins.
Read the rest of this article at Edge Effects here…
Latest posts by Jessica DeWitt (see all)
- #EnvHist Worth Reading: September 2020 - October 6, 2020
- Call for Submissions – Saskatchewan Environmental History - October 1, 2020
- #EnvHist Worth Reading: August 2020 - September 17, 2020
- Introducing NiCHE Conversations - September 15, 2020
- #EnvHist Worth Reading: July 2020 - August 7, 2020
- The Precarity That Binds Us - July 23, 2020
- #EnvHist Worth Reading: June 2020 - July 9, 2020
- On Academic Weariness and Embracing Uncertainty - June 22, 2020
- #EnvHist Worth Reading: May 2020 - June 17, 2020
- Succession: Queering the Environment – An Introduction - June 2, 2020